Sunday, February 22, 2009
Stimulus Rush: Cocaine for the masses
Centrally, the stimulus bill was rushed, possibly in order to begin a process of inserting certain leftist ideas a la Emanuel. No crisis wasted indeed. Proof of this is in the solar panel debate, where a thoughtful plan would have granted each homeowner in the US a rebate for installing solar panels on their roofs, so that ALL American homeowners take advantage of this wonderful technological resource, we have a bill that is worried about family planning as though this was the third world. Can't tell you how disappointed I was when Madame Pelosi defended the family planning provisions, when a careful and thoughtful legislation might have began to identify and mitigate American pains and started leading us back to prosperity. You will find, without a doubt, that the Congressional Budget Office was precise. Despite the politics of our time, it is better to do nothing than do the wrong thing. Nancy Pelosi and President Obama have done the wrong thing, foolishly, and so now own the economy and the inability to fix it. I can give several more examples of what a thoughtful stimulus bill ought to have contained, and will probably do so as the indices continue to fluctuate. But let's be clear, if you spend a trillion dollars on ANYTHING we ought to see movement soon. Not next year, because you rushed a bill that makes no sense! It is too much, however, to get the media to accept the responsibility of being the taxpayers watchdog, who say that "doing nothing" would be worse, politically, than doing the wrong thing but don't say that doing the wrong thing should never be an option in the world's greatest economy.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
A Word for Madame Pelosi
Nancy Pelosi grew up to become the third most powerful person in the United States.
The question, Pope Benedicts so rightly asks, was Nancy Pelosi the speaker of the
house at the age of six? Twelve? When exactly did Madame Pelosi become speaker of
the house.
"The answer to that is above my pay grade" the dishonest adult would say.
The honest one would say that from the moment it was conceivable, Nancy Pelosi WAS speaker of the house. Surely, she one day was voted in and fulfilled her destiny,
but can this destiny be denied any child, whose destiny is determined, as Nancy's, by God or the Divine hand of Providence? When man begins to determine his own destiny, man falls. Madame Pelosi should agree, that in keeping with what Life is, as Life comes to be in fulfillment what it was meant to be, quibling about the exact moment the soul enters the fused sperm/cell entity is dishonest. It is life and should be accorded respect under the laws of man, or at least those who claim to be in communion with the teachings of Christ. Dearest Nancy (love the hair, btw!), there is absolutely nothing inconsistent with being a Democrat and encouring life. If the view is such as Mr. Obamas, that we ought not legislate morality, we only ask that you at least be honest about our failure to be moral.
The question, Pope Benedicts so rightly asks, was Nancy Pelosi the speaker of the
house at the age of six? Twelve? When exactly did Madame Pelosi become speaker of
the house.
"The answer to that is above my pay grade" the dishonest adult would say.
The honest one would say that from the moment it was conceivable, Nancy Pelosi WAS speaker of the house. Surely, she one day was voted in and fulfilled her destiny,
but can this destiny be denied any child, whose destiny is determined, as Nancy's, by God or the Divine hand of Providence? When man begins to determine his own destiny, man falls. Madame Pelosi should agree, that in keeping with what Life is, as Life comes to be in fulfillment what it was meant to be, quibling about the exact moment the soul enters the fused sperm/cell entity is dishonest. It is life and should be accorded respect under the laws of man, or at least those who claim to be in communion with the teachings of Christ. Dearest Nancy (love the hair, btw!), there is absolutely nothing inconsistent with being a Democrat and encouring life. If the view is such as Mr. Obamas, that we ought not legislate morality, we only ask that you at least be honest about our failure to be moral.
Monday, February 16, 2009
For the Conspiracy Buffs: Where we are today
1] And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars:
[2] And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.
[3] And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.
[4] And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
[5] And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
[6] And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
[7] And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
[8] And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
[9] And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
[10] And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.
[11] And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
[12] Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
[13] And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.
[14] And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent.
[15] And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood.
[16] And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
[17] And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
[2] And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered.
[3] And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.
[4] And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.
[5] And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.
[6] And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she hath a place prepared of God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and threescore days.
[7] And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,
[8] And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.
[9] And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
[10] And I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, Now is come salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of his Christ: for the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night.
[11] And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
[12] Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
[13] And when the dragon saw that he was cast unto the earth, he persecuted the woman which brought forth the man child.
[14] And to the woman were given two wings of a great eagle, that she might fly into the wilderness, into her place, where she is nourished for a time, and times, and half a time, from the face of the serpent.
[15] And the serpent cast out of his mouth water as a flood after the woman, that he might cause her to be carried away of the flood.
[16] And the earth helped the woman, and the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed up the flood which the dragon cast out of his mouth.
[17] And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
Al Ilah : the "I Am"
In Arab culture, Al Ilah, the deity, is identified by who spoke to Musa, ostensibly
the God of Ibrahim and Yitzak. The concept of the deity--that through whom life lives--is one that is quite trivial to older civilizations but seemingly too complex for ours to embrace intelligently. In the bible, in Exodus, Musa asks God his name: God say "I am that I am". What does this mean? In "High" religions, God is within, but createad the without. In these religions, sourced from Melchizedekian Astrology, the universe is a system which gives life license on earth. Knowing nothing about other planets with life, we can say that what Life is is the substance that is earth and its reaction with the universal system granted power of attorney by sol invictus--the unconquered sun--and all auxillary input. So, the "I" is identified as what makes it possible for you and me to both say "I". That I is the I of "I am." I who. I that. I which. When we drink water, it is I, through us, who is satisfied. When we eat food it is I, through us, who enjoys the release of pheromones in I's distributed center, the brain. Yorubas might call "I" Aye-Wa, our life. The Jews, YHWH. Christians, Je'Ourve. Catholics, Dominus Solus. This concept is important, for we are, in the image of "I", dual form volitional agents. Our first form is within, "I," our second form is without. The without is created by God the almighty father, creator of heaven and earth. In this form, through thunder, lightning and great works he appeared to Abraham, but to Moses he appeared as the "I". This is the distinction. But why did he appear to Moses within, but to all else without? Because Moses was a ruler of Egypt when he forsook the evil ways of the Pharaohs of the time, but knowing only what he had secretly been taught of his own people, this thirty-third degree grand mason of Oke-Meta left his plush position in the realms of the rich, and took his people back to their fatherland. A University Chancellor, disillusioned by the lack of morality, becomes a nomad, with a few cows and an entourage--just like Abraham. And wouldn't you know, he succeeded. He made it back home. At least, his people did. The book of Leviticus shows Moses, once the most sophisticated man alive, struggling with the ancient ways of Abraham, a Moses who lived in Cosmopolitan Egypt that was every bit as sophisticated, perhaps more, than America today. He became a Fulani Cattle rearer and crosses the red sea into the land of his Father Abraham. It is clear that the "I" was who convicted Musa to seek his own God, if morality did not exist in the gods of Egypt despite their advanced technology and society. We call this the two Gods, Jehovah-Yaweh, who existed only and then had a thought. From this though he carefully crafted the Universe, then inhabited his creation from a point in space.
To be sure, for any skeptics, Life is defined as any mobile entity that can, seemingly at "will," circumvent the universal signal because of which all orbit is ordered. This is to say one might easily begin walking around in a circle all one's life, to demonstrate that only orbit is rational. Anything material that can escape universal orbit MUST have been granted the Powers of WHO created orbit, in order for orbit to be relevant only in context. We are made in the image of God.
Now, about that, "let us make man in our image and likeness." This statement was spoken by the council of 33rd Degree Grand Masons and the interpretation is: "Let us make man to be like us, holy, pure, and 1 in God." But man fell, and from time to time God raises the gods to make man God. Al Ilah, the deity.
the God of Ibrahim and Yitzak. The concept of the deity--that through whom life lives--is one that is quite trivial to older civilizations but seemingly too complex for ours to embrace intelligently. In the bible, in Exodus, Musa asks God his name: God say "I am that I am". What does this mean? In "High" religions, God is within, but createad the without. In these religions, sourced from Melchizedekian Astrology, the universe is a system which gives life license on earth. Knowing nothing about other planets with life, we can say that what Life is is the substance that is earth and its reaction with the universal system granted power of attorney by sol invictus--the unconquered sun--and all auxillary input. So, the "I" is identified as what makes it possible for you and me to both say "I". That I is the I of "I am." I who. I that. I which. When we drink water, it is I, through us, who is satisfied. When we eat food it is I, through us, who enjoys the release of pheromones in I's distributed center, the brain. Yorubas might call "I" Aye-Wa, our life. The Jews, YHWH. Christians, Je'Ourve. Catholics, Dominus Solus. This concept is important, for we are, in the image of "I", dual form volitional agents. Our first form is within, "I," our second form is without. The without is created by God the almighty father, creator of heaven and earth. In this form, through thunder, lightning and great works he appeared to Abraham, but to Moses he appeared as the "I". This is the distinction. But why did he appear to Moses within, but to all else without? Because Moses was a ruler of Egypt when he forsook the evil ways of the Pharaohs of the time, but knowing only what he had secretly been taught of his own people, this thirty-third degree grand mason of Oke-Meta left his plush position in the realms of the rich, and took his people back to their fatherland. A University Chancellor, disillusioned by the lack of morality, becomes a nomad, with a few cows and an entourage--just like Abraham. And wouldn't you know, he succeeded. He made it back home. At least, his people did. The book of Leviticus shows Moses, once the most sophisticated man alive, struggling with the ancient ways of Abraham, a Moses who lived in Cosmopolitan Egypt that was every bit as sophisticated, perhaps more, than America today. He became a Fulani Cattle rearer and crosses the red sea into the land of his Father Abraham. It is clear that the "I" was who convicted Musa to seek his own God, if morality did not exist in the gods of Egypt despite their advanced technology and society. We call this the two Gods, Jehovah-Yaweh, who existed only and then had a thought. From this though he carefully crafted the Universe, then inhabited his creation from a point in space.
To be sure, for any skeptics, Life is defined as any mobile entity that can, seemingly at "will," circumvent the universal signal because of which all orbit is ordered. This is to say one might easily begin walking around in a circle all one's life, to demonstrate that only orbit is rational. Anything material that can escape universal orbit MUST have been granted the Powers of WHO created orbit, in order for orbit to be relevant only in context. We are made in the image of God.
Now, about that, "let us make man in our image and likeness." This statement was spoken by the council of 33rd Degree Grand Masons and the interpretation is: "Let us make man to be like us, holy, pure, and 1 in God." But man fell, and from time to time God raises the gods to make man God. Al Ilah, the deity.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Palin 2012: The Stimulus
No one has ever considered it wise, what the Prince did with Helen of Troy. And yet
with Sarah of Alaska, one cannot help believing in her ability to lead this country
out of the dark ages inspired by the lack of precision driven by the first Negro
chief executive. So, on good authority you might declaim that the Palin '12 campaign begins here. Now to the other stimulus.
...
America's economy is defined, I challenge Mr. Geithner to dispute, by innovation
driven by the culture of freedom, bounded by America's natural resources in relevant states of development. For example, when I am liquified, the restaurant Birchfields on Main Street becomes alive. I do a sermon there every Friday, the Masons replicate it with a wonderful Colored Musician band on Sundays and throughout the week the venue has a slow but steady trickle of customers who have heard about the wings and jukebox, pool players, homeless people (paydirt!) and whatnot. Within three months of Birchfield's being lit, at least four other spots including the Anchor Bar are heavy with activity. It seems Birchfields, being the last remaining clean and safe spot for hoodies, drives Buffalo night life. Coupled with an adequate theater season, and one can see how just one person at his favorite nightclub is who is important in stimulating the economy of Western New York. You can ask a mason if you feel I have overstated the singular importance of the French term "mortgage." But it doesn't stop there. Within six to nine months, Rochester and NYC are open for business, the empire corridor is lit. I travel to NYC "from time to time" to take advantage of a standing welcome on Broadway-ASN, something that helps, for me being a creative genius, inspire American genius in drama and music. Just one man can make a difference. But that's just one man, a conservatory level pianist, whose favorite night spot, Birchfields, is as well the favorite night spot of many of his students, a spot which like the Bermuda triangle begins to build up force when the pianist is in season. A similar thing happens in Atlanta GA, where certain median indices drive the wheels of entertainment value. The Secretary's plan must identify American value, it's resources, and where the culture of freedom thrives or is threatened and use these as primary regressands to help create an informal but nearly formal classification rating system for value and credit. It is the only way in which banks will lend. For example, few of the CEOs who spent money badly during the first portion of the TARP would have done so had ATrillion-Semantix been public at the time. Today, those who have liquidity left are cashing in on the new century's Microsoft, so as we can see they have no problem lending. It is this core lending, towards innovation, that ultimately drives the lesser lending, towards business scale, and the even lesser lending, towards consumer spending. The secretary must be aware that it is the force of the idea, such as the atrillion portal (http://www.achaeleon.com), that determines credit worthiness. And so his boss, who derides the ownership society, is wrong. For the CEO of ATrillion, for having such value and being besoth by so many major investors, has not even once cried out about the "bad credit situation." Apparently, the idea is "good for it." So, "as to" the debate between Tax Cuts and Spending, I, as the most valuable American CEO can tell you my position, if it is not obvious. I came from a poverty stricken country, Nigeria, with an idea that has turned out to be worth a million dollars. To finance this idea and take it to the level it deserves, I need the overnight bank-to-bank rates at zero so that tomorrow when I go to Ken Lewis for funding, he will have borrowed enough to lend to me for max effect, idealy zero interest, but this sort of proposition is not wise for Mr. Lewis. This dialog, between Ken and I, will determine lending rates granting the tension required to bring my project to fruition. Once this is taken care of, the financing of the next great American idea, then one can think of spending on adjunct capital investments to augment the value the idea so obviously brings to the American polity. I think we will leave it at that, lest the Secretary begins to believe that "putting people to work" is something that is done without considering what the job is, especially when value exists with regards to work that NEEDS to be done.
Quickly I should sound a note of peril, Mr.Obama dishonestly--very unbecoming of a Great Kenyan--blames past administrations for running the economy into the ground. In fact, quite the contrary is clearly the case, given the Democrat's new chorus for regulation. The private sector is what did us in, and if putting Pampers on CEOs as Mr. Obama has so FOOLISHLY done, forever alienating the business executive class (ask a CEO), it is because of the likes of Ken Lay with MCI Worldcom, Arthur-Andersen, etc, etc. In a famous memo to the past president I lamented that his "friends had done us in." So we are willing, in natural adjustment for American greed, to let history regulate in balance what we could not regulate by force of example. September 11 was a landmark, after which Mr. Bush skillfully, with me as witness, kept this country safe, waged two wars, and held the economy along despite news after news item pointing to the greed of his fellow CEOs, many of them if not most Democrats. I tell all who will listen that after 9-11, just keeping us safe was a triumph. Although Mr. Obama claims not to believe in this war on terror, despite a terrorist act on his watch which I am certain he will ignore, in trying to please the terrorist state responsible, Iran. An abomination in the sight of American men! I think pride should soon give way to understanding. America is at war. Mr. Obama's job is to continue to keep America safe within, wind up the wars without, and restore prosperity to America. On the first portion, keeping America safe, he is already failing. On winding up the wars, his precipitous withdrawal from Iraq, the most strategic nation in our portfolio next to Mexico, is myopic. If we won Afghanistan then needed to go back in, what makes him think we won't need to go back into Iraq, something the American people will not stand for. We had suggested a slow, but certain withdrawal, Obama created a fantasy then was surprised when such like Nancy Pelosi believed it and did his presidency in within two weeks. So now he's saving face by standing by Madam Pelosi, showing that he was unprepared for such a hands-on time and hands-on job. I remember, fondly, just how engaged President Bush was. I certainly felt safter with him, and being his chief economist, was eager to bring value to that discussion, despite the greed of our friends. The new president would do well to listen to American value. It sings.
with Sarah of Alaska, one cannot help believing in her ability to lead this country
out of the dark ages inspired by the lack of precision driven by the first Negro
chief executive. So, on good authority you might declaim that the Palin '12 campaign begins here. Now to the other stimulus.
...
America's economy is defined, I challenge Mr. Geithner to dispute, by innovation
driven by the culture of freedom, bounded by America's natural resources in relevant states of development. For example, when I am liquified, the restaurant Birchfields on Main Street becomes alive. I do a sermon there every Friday, the Masons replicate it with a wonderful Colored Musician band on Sundays and throughout the week the venue has a slow but steady trickle of customers who have heard about the wings and jukebox, pool players, homeless people (paydirt!) and whatnot. Within three months of Birchfield's being lit, at least four other spots including the Anchor Bar are heavy with activity. It seems Birchfields, being the last remaining clean and safe spot for hoodies, drives Buffalo night life. Coupled with an adequate theater season, and one can see how just one person at his favorite nightclub is who is important in stimulating the economy of Western New York. You can ask a mason if you feel I have overstated the singular importance of the French term "mortgage." But it doesn't stop there. Within six to nine months, Rochester and NYC are open for business, the empire corridor is lit. I travel to NYC "from time to time" to take advantage of a standing welcome on Broadway-ASN, something that helps, for me being a creative genius, inspire American genius in drama and music. Just one man can make a difference. But that's just one man, a conservatory level pianist, whose favorite night spot, Birchfields, is as well the favorite night spot of many of his students, a spot which like the Bermuda triangle begins to build up force when the pianist is in season. A similar thing happens in Atlanta GA, where certain median indices drive the wheels of entertainment value. The Secretary's plan must identify American value, it's resources, and where the culture of freedom thrives or is threatened and use these as primary regressands to help create an informal but nearly formal classification rating system for value and credit. It is the only way in which banks will lend. For example, few of the CEOs who spent money badly during the first portion of the TARP would have done so had ATrillion-Semantix been public at the time. Today, those who have liquidity left are cashing in on the new century's Microsoft, so as we can see they have no problem lending. It is this core lending, towards innovation, that ultimately drives the lesser lending, towards business scale, and the even lesser lending, towards consumer spending. The secretary must be aware that it is the force of the idea, such as the atrillion portal (http://www.achaeleon.com), that determines credit worthiness. And so his boss, who derides the ownership society, is wrong. For the CEO of ATrillion, for having such value and being besoth by so many major investors, has not even once cried out about the "bad credit situation." Apparently, the idea is "good for it." So, "as to" the debate between Tax Cuts and Spending, I, as the most valuable American CEO can tell you my position, if it is not obvious. I came from a poverty stricken country, Nigeria, with an idea that has turned out to be worth a million dollars. To finance this idea and take it to the level it deserves, I need the overnight bank-to-bank rates at zero so that tomorrow when I go to Ken Lewis for funding, he will have borrowed enough to lend to me for max effect, idealy zero interest, but this sort of proposition is not wise for Mr. Lewis. This dialog, between Ken and I, will determine lending rates granting the tension required to bring my project to fruition. Once this is taken care of, the financing of the next great American idea, then one can think of spending on adjunct capital investments to augment the value the idea so obviously brings to the American polity. I think we will leave it at that, lest the Secretary begins to believe that "putting people to work" is something that is done without considering what the job is, especially when value exists with regards to work that NEEDS to be done.
Quickly I should sound a note of peril, Mr.Obama dishonestly--very unbecoming of a Great Kenyan--blames past administrations for running the economy into the ground. In fact, quite the contrary is clearly the case, given the Democrat's new chorus for regulation. The private sector is what did us in, and if putting Pampers on CEOs as Mr. Obama has so FOOLISHLY done, forever alienating the business executive class (ask a CEO), it is because of the likes of Ken Lay with MCI Worldcom, Arthur-Andersen, etc, etc. In a famous memo to the past president I lamented that his "friends had done us in." So we are willing, in natural adjustment for American greed, to let history regulate in balance what we could not regulate by force of example. September 11 was a landmark, after which Mr. Bush skillfully, with me as witness, kept this country safe, waged two wars, and held the economy along despite news after news item pointing to the greed of his fellow CEOs, many of them if not most Democrats. I tell all who will listen that after 9-11, just keeping us safe was a triumph. Although Mr. Obama claims not to believe in this war on terror, despite a terrorist act on his watch which I am certain he will ignore, in trying to please the terrorist state responsible, Iran. An abomination in the sight of American men! I think pride should soon give way to understanding. America is at war. Mr. Obama's job is to continue to keep America safe within, wind up the wars without, and restore prosperity to America. On the first portion, keeping America safe, he is already failing. On winding up the wars, his precipitous withdrawal from Iraq, the most strategic nation in our portfolio next to Mexico, is myopic. If we won Afghanistan then needed to go back in, what makes him think we won't need to go back into Iraq, something the American people will not stand for. We had suggested a slow, but certain withdrawal, Obama created a fantasy then was surprised when such like Nancy Pelosi believed it and did his presidency in within two weeks. So now he's saving face by standing by Madam Pelosi, showing that he was unprepared for such a hands-on time and hands-on job. I remember, fondly, just how engaged President Bush was. I certainly felt safter with him, and being his chief economist, was eager to bring value to that discussion, despite the greed of our friends. The new president would do well to listen to American value. It sings.
Monday, February 9, 2009
Difference Between A Stimulus Bill and a Spending Bill
"They say it's not a stimulus bill, that's it's a spending bill. Well, what do you think a stimulus is? That's the point! No, really!"
President Obama displaying "seismic" ignorance about the economy. First, allow me tackle "this notion" that the last administration ran us into the ground. My value, ascertained by certain agencies, is beyond "quite significant." The technologies I have helped develop are said to be seminal. It is why I have a voice in this debate, for only in America do we find value given its worth or anywhere close to it. So I know. Folks on the man's team can easily verify my record, then whistle loudly for all to hear, if and when they discover America's first trillionaire, granted his money by an alien spaceship, the Space Station Jerusalem. Ahem.
The economy, folks, is componentized by scarcity. A Stimulus bill develops wealth-generating resources at varying levels of depth, a spending bill is meant to improve capital infrastructure as an adjunct to developing wealth generating resources. I'll say this only once, that Mr. Obama and Dr. Summers are certain, if not now, tomorrow to lead America into bankruptcy. These... gentlemen continue to ignore my value, notarized by global securities, to win an intellectual argument long since lost. Mr. Obama has lost faith in his own ability to administer the second part of the TARP--something I can do quite easily if he hired me, with, gousha, charts, maps, detailed semantics and e'erthing--and so wants a super TARP, to put people back to work "for a season" then coerce them to spend American during which time they will ostensibly put their money in banks and then the banks will lend. This is a fallacy. Lending, mortgage, is where the problem is and if the TARP was a failure the first time, then it is Obama's duty to fix it. For crying out loud, three fifty bill is more money than I've ever lent anyone, except treasury, once, but that was for the "War Against Violent Extremism" in Iraq. It ought to fix the problem. I can detail how, ANYTIME Dr. Summers wants to challenge me, but for a man who believes that women are lesser, I can't imagine that he would have the temperament to debate with America's first trillionaire. It takes a while sir, but it does roll off the tongue easy. Trillionaire. Instead of Messers Obama and Summers to get with the program and admit what crashed the economy--my value--as was admitted by previoius kings, they shall run America into the ground and she is certain, under Obama, to lose her dominance.
Besides this, I think that Mr. Obama's comportment is... an embarrasment. For a leader to use fearmongering for political reasons is something we'd expect from Hugo Chavez or Ahmadinejad. Instead, Obama bandies words like "irreversible" and "catastrophic" to speak to an issue I would easilly win in any sort of fair forum, since I am censored because, obviously, I am smarter than our president! I predict that the Stimulus will be like President Obasanjo's power expendisture. It will yield little and will not solve the liquidity crisis which is bound to linger so long as the Obama administration fails to calibrate, like President Bush did, the American securities market to correct for the empirical tension required to finance the best ideas. America is about ideas, not "jobs" created by the government. I'm a strict capitalist, but having been laid off once in my career, I realize that the politics are sensitive. Let's be honest, Mr. Obama indeed screwed up, but not in nominating Daschle. He screwed up in not being hands on while Nancy Pelosi behaved like a foolish brat, jeopardizing his presidency in totality. If the bill was that important, then Obama ought to have pressured Pelosi for the sort of compromise because of which the bill would have already passed. Instead, Pelosi stuffs the bill with foolishness and says that these foolishnesses are better than tax cuts. Go figure. I content that liberal theology is dying in the minds of most serious men. And women.
President Obama displaying "seismic" ignorance about the economy. First, allow me tackle "this notion" that the last administration ran us into the ground. My value, ascertained by certain agencies, is beyond "quite significant." The technologies I have helped develop are said to be seminal. It is why I have a voice in this debate, for only in America do we find value given its worth or anywhere close to it. So I know. Folks on the man's team can easily verify my record, then whistle loudly for all to hear, if and when they discover America's first trillionaire, granted his money by an alien spaceship, the Space Station Jerusalem. Ahem.
The economy, folks, is componentized by scarcity. A Stimulus bill develops wealth-generating resources at varying levels of depth, a spending bill is meant to improve capital infrastructure as an adjunct to developing wealth generating resources. I'll say this only once, that Mr. Obama and Dr. Summers are certain, if not now, tomorrow to lead America into bankruptcy. These... gentlemen continue to ignore my value, notarized by global securities, to win an intellectual argument long since lost. Mr. Obama has lost faith in his own ability to administer the second part of the TARP--something I can do quite easily if he hired me, with, gousha, charts, maps, detailed semantics and e'erthing--and so wants a super TARP, to put people back to work "for a season" then coerce them to spend American during which time they will ostensibly put their money in banks and then the banks will lend. This is a fallacy. Lending, mortgage, is where the problem is and if the TARP was a failure the first time, then it is Obama's duty to fix it. For crying out loud, three fifty bill is more money than I've ever lent anyone, except treasury, once, but that was for the "War Against Violent Extremism" in Iraq. It ought to fix the problem. I can detail how, ANYTIME Dr. Summers wants to challenge me, but for a man who believes that women are lesser, I can't imagine that he would have the temperament to debate with America's first trillionaire. It takes a while sir, but it does roll off the tongue easy. Trillionaire. Instead of Messers Obama and Summers to get with the program and admit what crashed the economy--my value--as was admitted by previoius kings, they shall run America into the ground and she is certain, under Obama, to lose her dominance.
Besides this, I think that Mr. Obama's comportment is... an embarrasment. For a leader to use fearmongering for political reasons is something we'd expect from Hugo Chavez or Ahmadinejad. Instead, Obama bandies words like "irreversible" and "catastrophic" to speak to an issue I would easilly win in any sort of fair forum, since I am censored because, obviously, I am smarter than our president! I predict that the Stimulus will be like President Obasanjo's power expendisture. It will yield little and will not solve the liquidity crisis which is bound to linger so long as the Obama administration fails to calibrate, like President Bush did, the American securities market to correct for the empirical tension required to finance the best ideas. America is about ideas, not "jobs" created by the government. I'm a strict capitalist, but having been laid off once in my career, I realize that the politics are sensitive. Let's be honest, Mr. Obama indeed screwed up, but not in nominating Daschle. He screwed up in not being hands on while Nancy Pelosi behaved like a foolish brat, jeopardizing his presidency in totality. If the bill was that important, then Obama ought to have pressured Pelosi for the sort of compromise because of which the bill would have already passed. Instead, Pelosi stuffs the bill with foolishness and says that these foolishnesses are better than tax cuts. Go figure. I content that liberal theology is dying in the minds of most serious men. And women.
Thursday, February 5, 2009
America: A Habit of Slavery
The answer is enculcating informed consumerism. America is in a conundrum.
First, we shower platitudes on the Republican Patriot who left his watch to
further his career, supposing the governor would sacrifice duty and "make a deal"
to protect the source of his career.
Now, it is a strange situation, that we have a class of citizens, mexican tomato
pickers, who do so for menial wages because there are jobs but they are the jobs
Americans don't want to do. They are not quality-of-life ready, or as we say,
POH-R. The solution is smart technology such as designed earlier today that corrects
the market so that one might make a living using robotics, say, to do what illegal
aliens had till that point been doing. But can it be done? It was done today.
If it is ignored, then America has no one to blame for being left wide open
on account of something not dissimilar to the... essence of slavery. an abomination in the sight of God.
First, we shower platitudes on the Republican Patriot who left his watch to
further his career, supposing the governor would sacrifice duty and "make a deal"
to protect the source of his career.
Now, it is a strange situation, that we have a class of citizens, mexican tomato
pickers, who do so for menial wages because there are jobs but they are the jobs
Americans don't want to do. They are not quality-of-life ready, or as we say,
POH-R. The solution is smart technology such as designed earlier today that corrects
the market so that one might make a living using robotics, say, to do what illegal
aliens had till that point been doing. But can it be done? It was done today.
If it is ignored, then America has no one to blame for being left wide open
on account of something not dissimilar to the... essence of slavery. an abomination in the sight of God.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Seismic Problems with the Obama Presidency
1. The non "War on Terror"
President Obama's response to Anderson Cooper on his shift from the phrase "War on Terror" demonstrates a seismic naivete about the Global Jihad sponsored originally by Al Kaeda in 1997, one which will not end without a reasonable attempt to create or provide a homeland for muslims--assuming it true that America still props up autocracy in the Islamic world--as well as an intellectual misreading of islam itself. Having schooled in Indonesia, it is unfortunate that Mr. Obama does not understand the Koran and yet chooses to isolate himself from well-meaning advice proferred by those of us, being truly muslim, who do. See Surat 9, Hussein. Mr. Obama, you see, is a politician more intrigued by the beast and its image--how we are viewed from without--and so wants to signal to the "moderate muslim world", a fantasy created by Fareed Zakaria and our truly well meaning friend Fouad Ajami, that we gots their back. Mr. Obama would do well to recall the lessons of history, for in history do we find the answer to jihad. It is, Obama, called democracy. Islamic government of the Islamic People for the Islamic People by the Islamic People. You can call it Islamic Democracy, but the implications of its emic structure demonstrates it can be done, so long as we hold ourselves to the same high standards abroad as we do at home.
Mr. Obama, President Bush used the phrase "War on Terror" on instruction from the Department responsible for the common and sovereign defense because of the sequence of events, recursive and not, following the plane attacks of 9-11. Our current president fails, it seems, to appreciate that there is a war--the Global Jihad--and that it was called and waged against us, not the other way round. His pacifist stance, brought about by as eggregious a misreading of the polity as his cabinet picks--lobbyists, tax cheats and all--will secure America's doom, a country led by an administration unwilling, for the sake of fashion, to do what it must to protect the country despite evidence that this "war" is just as real as World War II, and that America, even the CNN food court, has been breached and infiltrated by rebels of the Jihadist army. Oh that this were a Republican rant, and yet I, once a Nigerian prophet, have immediately assumed the posture of the American Isaiah, suggesting that there ought to come, in time, a Negro better suited to the delicate task of healing this country and moving us forward. Instead, Obama's hubris and arrogance have made certain the demise of liberal theology, energized for good or bad the Conservative Right, and put America towards the path of serious racial and cultural conflagration. Over the past two weeks I have watched in horror as Mr. Obama's leadership, made evident by the STUPID decision to insult Sarah Palin and by mass hypnosis pushed by Oprah and Barbara Walters cover it up, bring America to the highest tension levels I've seen in my eighteen years in this country. I am very concerned that Mr. Obama's autocratic campaign style, his penchant for rule by fiat and win by surprise, has caught up with us. And at this moment, when America needed a black man like myself, one who could unite all people, sure in his philosophy and quick in his knowledge, pure in his assumption and true in his word, we have the very definition of a word that will now no longer be a mystery in history. Nigger
President Obama's response to Anderson Cooper on his shift from the phrase "War on Terror" demonstrates a seismic naivete about the Global Jihad sponsored originally by Al Kaeda in 1997, one which will not end without a reasonable attempt to create or provide a homeland for muslims--assuming it true that America still props up autocracy in the Islamic world--as well as an intellectual misreading of islam itself. Having schooled in Indonesia, it is unfortunate that Mr. Obama does not understand the Koran and yet chooses to isolate himself from well-meaning advice proferred by those of us, being truly muslim, who do. See Surat 9, Hussein. Mr. Obama, you see, is a politician more intrigued by the beast and its image--how we are viewed from without--and so wants to signal to the "moderate muslim world", a fantasy created by Fareed Zakaria and our truly well meaning friend Fouad Ajami, that we gots their back. Mr. Obama would do well to recall the lessons of history, for in history do we find the answer to jihad. It is, Obama, called democracy. Islamic government of the Islamic People for the Islamic People by the Islamic People. You can call it Islamic Democracy, but the implications of its emic structure demonstrates it can be done, so long as we hold ourselves to the same high standards abroad as we do at home.
Mr. Obama, President Bush used the phrase "War on Terror" on instruction from the Department responsible for the common and sovereign defense because of the sequence of events, recursive and not, following the plane attacks of 9-11. Our current president fails, it seems, to appreciate that there is a war--the Global Jihad--and that it was called and waged against us, not the other way round. His pacifist stance, brought about by as eggregious a misreading of the polity as his cabinet picks--lobbyists, tax cheats and all--will secure America's doom, a country led by an administration unwilling, for the sake of fashion, to do what it must to protect the country despite evidence that this "war" is just as real as World War II, and that America, even the CNN food court, has been breached and infiltrated by rebels of the Jihadist army. Oh that this were a Republican rant, and yet I, once a Nigerian prophet, have immediately assumed the posture of the American Isaiah, suggesting that there ought to come, in time, a Negro better suited to the delicate task of healing this country and moving us forward. Instead, Obama's hubris and arrogance have made certain the demise of liberal theology, energized for good or bad the Conservative Right, and put America towards the path of serious racial and cultural conflagration. Over the past two weeks I have watched in horror as Mr. Obama's leadership, made evident by the STUPID decision to insult Sarah Palin and by mass hypnosis pushed by Oprah and Barbara Walters cover it up, bring America to the highest tension levels I've seen in my eighteen years in this country. I am very concerned that Mr. Obama's autocratic campaign style, his penchant for rule by fiat and win by surprise, has caught up with us. And at this moment, when America needed a black man like myself, one who could unite all people, sure in his philosophy and quick in his knowledge, pure in his assumption and true in his word, we have the very definition of a word that will now no longer be a mystery in history. Nigger
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)