Hannity on KSM

Sir:

A while back a black man, himself of the cloth, sued
a Korean dry cleaner for false advertising. The Korean,
apparently, could not deliver on his promise of satisfaction
as a guarantee. The suit was for millions of dollars. While
many saw it as frivolous, observers of America's jurisprudence
recognized it as a signal that American jurisprudence was on
trial. It was a powerful symbol, and though the Korean
dry cleaner was not asked, in the end, to pay millions of
dollars for inadequate dry cleaning, Americans took note.
The decision to try KSM in civilian court is ABOUT the application
of standards of justice. I am surprised, being from Africa,
how much more I seem to appreciate about the KSM case than
Americans who have lived America since birth. I guess I'm
a natural. It impossible, in the KSM case, for civilian
standards of justice to be applied "after the fact," causing
me to question whether our attorney general willfully intends
to corrupt American jurisprudence in some Masonic push
that sees white people and their system of things as being
"the enemy." A shocking suggestion, but how else can
any rational and intelligent adult view this... obnoxious
decision by the A.G? This will blow up into something
quite ridiculous if, in fact, civilian standards of
justice are here prevaricated for political reasons,
corrupting, as I said, the system thoroughly.

Secondly, I wish someone would ask the AG, once more,
what the M.O. should be if Osama Bin Laden is captured.
His response that "it would depend" is ambiguous and,
quite frankly, stalls any movement in the direction of
Bin Laden. I wish to suggest, then, that the AG may
be acting out in interests that do not represent "we
the people of the United States." I am now undecidedly
suspicious, as I was during the campaign, of the
powers behind this administration and its leader.