Judicial Review: A Challenge to Obama's Administration of American Affairs

The intrinsic legitimacy of a system of justice
is consensus and its implications. We cannot
assume for others what we assume for ourselves,
but when we agree, what we assume for ourselves
is not taken for granted. There is a cost
associated, therefore, with judicial review,
and its exercise implies, or ought to imply,
that all parties related in notarized uniform
contract have AGREED to the "system of things."
We ask, then, what are the implications of
exercising judicial review when even just one
party related in uniform contract is complicated
not just by not AGREEING to American standards
of jurisprudence, but is in fact incarcerated
pending resolution for AGREEING to a legal code
determined criminal to us interest. The bounds
of authority define the humanism of the American.
We do not assume for others what we assume for
ourselves, but when we agree, then it is very rare
that we display tendencies that do not lean
towards the sympathies accorded the disadvantaged
amongst us. When dealing, however, with martial
forces, whether or not they are stateless judicial
review and its exercise must be considered with
great restraint: for the cost may be too much to
bear for the conscience of an aggrieved people, General.
The legacy of this administration is now in jeopardy,
for even a conviction under civilian jurisprudence
would imply a corrupted system, sir, exercising
"magnanimity" to appease a mob, but neglecting
the very foundational tenets, General... of
Justice.