Sir and Madam:
"Good evening your excellency"
"Thank you. I appreciate your inquisitiveness
into my wellbeing and however it is that such
energy causes amusement and good cheer in this
instance, then allow me to apply meaningful
insight to the moment. I do not like politics
in the era of the foolish, but since you are
predicted to win the free and fair elections
by a land slide and since you have asked me
to preside as the executive leader of your
representative platform, then I must ask
what in this moment IS the most relevant
question that does justice to the taxpayers
of our beloved Republic: Can you demonstrate
"our" 'Representative Platform'? And if so,
can I demonstrate how and where it is unsuitable?
If not, then I will not be your candidate. If so,
then you will find the elements of renaissance embedded
in the mandate handed to us by destiny. Then,
be secure in the knowledge that since I am excellent,
if you are not you will not represent the highest
ideals of our people and culture. I am bound to this
by oath and the reputation of my intelligence, such
dignity bequeathed to me by an old wise man on account
of my scient decision to make morality my most relevant
priority in all, sir, all my actions. This standard
will be met or it will not be met. This is justice and
where arbitration arises, then justice also will be served.
Sir, my first question that will help us formulate good
policy concerns what we now have, power. Does God exist?"
"I'd have to say that in complete honesty given
the context and phrasing of the Question, SINCE
I know you to determine 'God' within the purview
of an almighty supreme being, all knowing and all
powerful, then given all I've read about such
a being it is more than likely, I intuit, that
such a being has spoken once in history and documented
by men as smart as we are."
"And yet you will find, Secretary, that thirty three percent
of ALL the people in our Republic will, by implication, DENY
that this almighty being must ONCE have spoken to our Fathers
who at the time God spoke were just as intelligent as we
are now. Why?"
"The answer your suggestion manual has here says 'the
Central Limit Theorem'. What is the Central Limit Theorem'?"
"It is the proposition that the measurement of activity
in activity space, in time, demonstrates a context for
determining the reason for the activity."
...in other words, WHAT God said, was Good for
most of humanity's benefit, despite what God
said being meant by God to be good for ALL of humanity's
benefit, since God controls what God said.
Therefore, if we did not have the story of Eve,
our God would be to blame for our own defection,
a dying race of foolish people. But that kernel
of intelligence, that suggests that the power of
God 'from time to time' is handed to man grants
God, in my heart, the time I need to understand,
in the precision that reflects the name God
gave me, what God said.
"Demonstrates a Context..."
Secretary, IF God exists, then the implication of
material humanity is a nature that is not of God but
associated, then connected to the nature of God.
Clearly, to the well informed, the connectable portion
of man's nature must come from the highest ideals
of our sort. The Christian Bible teaches that
in time there is a way of determining the eras
within which man, in the eternal context of
a species which is aggregated to fall short of
its highest connection with the source of life--a
dying breed of foolish people--exists within
the sort of environment which God, in any
reasonably connectable form exists. God does
not exist in filth and squalor nor in the minds
of the leaders responsible for the filth and squalor.
God, however, exists in my heart. So, I am incorruptible.
Shall this, Secretary, EVER be a problem so long as our
relationship lasts?"
"You do not even need to consult a dibia or take an oath
to a spirit god or sacrifice an idol. I am a man of God."
"You not a man of God, sir."
"Sir, I am a Christian"
"Then understand this. I am your boss and I understand everything.
If you do not always understand everything about the relevant universe
then you are not the boss. However, such an anomaly not withstanding,
of an executive who truly has perfect clarity as concerns the corporate
structure and the most tenable decisions to be effected in precision
in other to 'preside over a period of positive transformative change
by the enabling of a kernel of forward progression, however T.H,I'S the
most critical concept is formulated (policy-wise...'* I am also a man
of God. That I have said you are not a man of God does not mean
that, going forward, you cannot be a man of God. If in the future
you find that you are INDEED a man of God and WERE a man of
God at the time I accused you, before the highest judge in our
Republic, of NOT being a man of God, then as President of
the Federal Republic, I, without reservation, apologize.
Good evening.
Saturday, October 24, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment