Watchtower '09: Esaias Speaks

35] And some of them that stood by, when they heard it, said, Behold, he calleth Elias.

Gentlemen:

Please be not discouraged. In fact be encouraged.
Outside of the context of our discussion, I have an
IQ of 183 and so while you are yet ahead in years and
diligent in the study of the LORD, you may never have
encountered either the confidence given to me by the
Most High, nor the prowess with which the truth is
never hidden and has never been hidden from me. Of
all the organizations I have studied the Bible with,
the Jehovah's Witnesses will always hold a special place,
for according to my advisors, you most have a relatively
precise understand of the Christ, whose own IQ was 200,
which my IQ goes up to in times of National Security Crises.
So be encouraged, for you are speaking with a historical force,
a principality of the ancient city of Zaria, a Kingdom lost
in the fables of Africa. But since you asked, and since
you are curious, then I shall tell you my story.

I was born the heir to the Akarue clan in the Niger Delta,
though I was actually formed in America. My grandfather,
the Chief, asked that I return to Nigeria to bear the weight
of my heritage before I was born. So, one lonely night in
November, I was removed from my mother's belly by C-Section
at a time when they believed I was dead. In fact I was to
be aborted but I suddenly kicked and the doctors said "my,
what a powerful spirit." I have heard it all my life.

Having witnessed unbelievable decadence and corruption in
Nigeria, I came to the United States at the age of seventeen
and pursued all my dreams, fulfilling the last one two days
ago. I am thus accomplished, centered and a very happy
human being. As I like to say, no pessimist ever changed
the world.

In 1998 I was identified by certain gentlemen of a High IQ
organization with deep links to Wall St. and I underwent
three IQ tests and National Security Vetting when my IQ
charted above the percentile. At the NSV is where we discovered
that my IQ, when I am in my natural state and environment, is
a ground-shaking 183. To give you perspective, the average IQ
is just above 100 and anyone with an IQ of 120 is to be considered
quite intelligent. We later discovered and I demonstrate it upon
request, that my IQ can reach 200 if the situation calls for it.

One day, during one of the tests, if you were watching the tapes
it would seem that I 'created thunder' with my mind in an impressive
array of... motions and significations. In truth I was caught up
in the spirit, at the moment, representing certain groups in what
can be considered the "Olympics of the Mind" the true Olympics,
and the thunder seemed to be a recognition from... something, we said...
of my value at that function. A year later, walking home from the
grocery store, just before my apartment complex, a rainbow opened up
and touched down in front of me. I walked into the rainbow and stayed
there, not believing it, for two minutes. I have never heard of a human
being that has been at the end of a rainbow, so I could not take it for
granted. Already studying the Bible by then, having attained what the
Bhuddists call Nirvana--that peace which passeth all understanding that
comes from individual resolution (aten)--I was now sensitized to rainbows
and other signals from ... wherever. Since then, in the presence of
the most credible witness--the US Federating Authority--I have proven to
myself that these occurrences I have been and continue to be privy to are
not just supernatural coincidences for the High IQ fella. It is GOD
speaking. The rainbow we now associate with the days of Noah, for
the rainbow, in context, led to me demonstrating before a group
of cynical academics, that if I called upon God he would respond. They
asked me to, I did, and... in the context of several rainbows and other
spectacular signs--that I'm now used to--God did speak. In ways that
can now no longer be denied by any honest observer, I spoke (without
being aware at the time that I was doing so) about a Tsunami to come.
It came two months later and wiped out entire peoples and places, within
minutes. It was the voice of God. At this time, now a Vatican Student,
I asked to be given the latitude to once and for all understand, as you
do in your organization, "what does the Bible REALLY teach."

Having consulted for the US Government in experiments that have demonstrated
a higher power, or aliens, it was clearly incumbent upon me to reach resolution
concerning the Christ. Otherwise we might have to wonder if in fact aliens
were speaking to me.

The Pope appraised, I began my study and in studying with your organization
we agree on many things. But I cannot be psychotic. I must KNOW the truth,
for only that keeps me free.

1. When members of your organization speak of the Arch Angel Michael,
you ignore the fact that though you draw from the Book of Revelation,
despite the fact that the revelation is said to be DOCUMENTED in 96 CE,
the revealer is the RESURRECTED Christ. Now this is NOT some spirit
form in a light that appeared to John on the Island of Patmos, wherein
he began to jot down the vision. If you read the book of Ezekiel in
great detail you will see that the Revelation of the Christ is a teaching.

SO...

The synoptic gospels principally tell the story of an argument between one
man, Jesus, and his elders, the Pharisees. In the synoptic gospels we
see some rare gems, but these stories are told at a distance. Jesus did
this and Jesus said that. And the Pharisees were astonished. Nonetheless,
the Pharisees claimed that Jesus had made himself the son of God and told
Pilate that he was, thus, worthy of death.

"What is truth?"
"Judas, you betray me with a kiss!" Jesus was ecstatic, a fellow philosopher!

Then we see Jesus crucified. But in the story of what happens next, it
is clear that angels and a transformed Christ play a key role. For
the resurrected Christ appears to five hundred people in a transformed
state. When I ask if this was flesh and blood I get the ambiguous response
that though Christ's resurrected form is in the spirit, the flesh and
blood appearance was some sort of mystery. This is unacceptable sir.

When I approach, like you, people to teach the bible here's how it goes.

Sir, I say, can I have two weeks of your time or maybe a month or two? I need
to show you something fascinating.

Sure, the attentive mind says.

Then we go through Genesis 1-5 and understand cause and effect,
the difference between beginings and generations (or as you call
them 'histories'), Adam, original sin, the serpent, the sabbath and all the reasons humanity today is in a fallen state. We call this Hebrew Philosophy. Then
we quickly peruse Leviticus and detail how mind-boggling the law of
Moses is, how precise and how cumbersome and yet how logical
in the context of value. I in fact teach High IQ economics
to certain students using Leviticus to demonstrate the concept of value.
You may have read some of my works on this. Then we flit through the chronicles of Israel and Judah, the Kings, only four of which according to you were good. I tried
to think the other day of which four. David, Solomon, but how about Rehoboam
and Asa? In any case, by now it's almost brain freeze, but we persevere.
Then I take them into the meat of the teachings, the prophesies. We
go quickly through Isaiah and in their free time the diligent student
will marvel at how much one man can know. But then we go to Daniel
which has such precision that is provable--I use hieroglyphics to
prove what you normally prove using other means (I'm an expert in
those things, but gladly we agree on the time and times and half a time).
You say to yourself that the Prophet Daniel must have been a mathematical
genius. Then you go to Jeremiah and are astounded, the attempt to
comprehend the Majestic Precision of Ezekiel. By the time you scan
the teaching and saying of the so-called minor-prophet the student gets
it. No one person can truly know ALL of the Hebrew way and be so immersed
in its detail as to truly understand ALL the nuances of the prophets, the
law of Moses, the chronicles of Israel and even the stories in lore
of the days of the sons of God and the nephilim. But then comes the
New Testament and you show that Jesus, in fact, was a total compendium
of Jewish law and history. The Apostle Paul focuses us on his human
attributes, removing some of the mystical magic that today licenses
the strange behavior you do not like. All Jesus' miracles in the synoptic
gospel must be seen in the context of God, but if you really want to
convince a rational person that this magician is the son of God, you would
do well to ignore the synoptic gospels--BECAUSE of these acts of magic--
and focus immediately on the ACTUAL word and teaching of Jesus himself,
revealed by signification in the superlative word to his servant John.
When you do this, there is no need for miracles. The miracle is that
one man was TRULY that knowledgeable of the Jewish way and that he
wove ALL the prophesies, laws and chronicles into an allegorical prophetic
narrative to situate the wickedness of his elders in time, and then
situate the consequence according to the laws of YHWH. You will not
convince anyone that the book of the Revelation is not the most precise
accounting of the historical Jesus, and so why court controversy when it
is not necessary. The PURPOSE of the synoptic gospels is to introduce
us to the fact that there was a dispute concerning a man named Jesus
and if he, in fact, was Messiah--the anointed one of Israel.
Now, here's were we go different ways. You go from door to door, telling
people who are now tuned off because of the behavior of Christians, about
a magician who came to save them. Sir, NOBODY ever believes that, but
through coercion many are thought to come to know Christ. How can you
possibly know the Christ without understanding his foundation in Hebrew
lore? On the other hand, I go to the Israeli Knesset and by coreferencing
and debating and demonstrating I say to them: Can you now or in the
past imagine any of your body as knowledgeable as the man, whoever he was,
that taught and narrated the Revelation through signification of an angel?
The answer is unequivocally, NO! Therefore, I ask, must it not be true
that this man, whoever he is, WAS Messiah the anointed one of Israel.
They say "what you say is true." This single man was, indeed, the most
knowledgeable in those days of our history and culture and law. He MUST
have been Messiah. In my context no one has EVER denied what even Joe
Gail says, "what a mind." I bring that up because it proves the point
of Jesus without having to make him out to be some magician who, eventually,
licenses unnatural behavior as a magician will. I don't have to point to
his miracles in the synoptic gospels to win souls over. We just study
the testimony of Jesus--the spirit of prophesy--and by giving a precise
account of the High IQs of Isaiah, Daniel, Jeremaiah, Ezekiel, Nahum,
Micah, Habakkuk, etc, and the details of the Leviticans and sons of Aaron,
we are able to demonstrate that this single man, whoever he was, WAS
a miracle of Hebrew history. Why, then dear elders, court controversy.
The bible must be taught in proper context, otherwise your dissatisfaction
with the spiritism which a magician eventually licenses remains eternal.
And it is YOUR fault, for not focusing on the message of the Christ, his
testimony, the spirit of prophesy. Surely, you will not deny this? Surely,
you will not deny that if you make a person appreciate the mind boggling
gift of the Prophets of Israel, and then show "I, Jesus" in the context
of those prophets, a person is to be convinced that Jesus WAS Messiah.
Now that's the point of the bible, however many times YHWH appears, for
the entire bible is written about the Christ. Not a spirit form, but
a MAN who lived 600 or so years after the prophesy of Daniel, who we
tend to ignore. This man was no magician, but he was clearly a poet-prophet
the likes of which, if you have studied the prophets, Israel HAD never seen.
Now this is a more compelling and truthful argument than what I have learned
over the past few months... maybe who taught me lacked resolution, but he
failed to answer many questions I have in the detail I require for someone
intelligent who must make an accurate decision. And yet, no one who
studies in the way I have suggested EVER comes away not marveling at
Jesus the Christ and conceding, even in the inner recesses of their soul,
that this man--whoever he was--who signified these teachings... was Messiah,
the anointed one of Israel. So, if I am right, and your way of approaching
those who are thirsting for salvation is faulty, how then can you the expect
the judgment of God to take over. You may have covered the entire earth
preaching your version of the Good News, but sirs... in honesty, please
consider if you were able to do so using my approach. I don't think you
would find anyone unconvinced, after the study, about the FACT of who
Jesus was relative to Jewish history. And so, I ask you, why court controversy
by not focusing on the actual words and teachings that a sage gave his servant
over, clearly, the course of a lifetime? Ah... but if you do not relent,
then you will find, always, that while I am able to convince men big and small
that in the context of Jewish history Jesus was a marvel and at that time
ought have been considered Messiah, your organization will continue to
breed members psychological at war with the world, but only because you
failed to use the right keys to unlock them from the captivity of the evil one.

I'm not here arguing about heaven and hell and resurrection and those things.
I'm singularly introducing the Jesus, the Christ, in precision, so that I can
listen and you can respond to me and tell me why, in your literature, you have
failed to be as effective reaching the world as I have been effective in
convincing one High IQ person after another that Jesus WAS Messiah. Certainly
my domain is those of High IQ because these are the people I am around and work
with. But if after ten years I continually have a successful record in
convincing the High IQ members that Jesus was indeed the anointed one of Israel,
by focusing on the Revelation in the context of ALL the prophets and their marvel,
as well as the Law of Moses and Adamic history and the chronicles of the Kings
of Israel and Judah, then you ought to really reevaluate your approach to
saving souls. We agree on the necessity for salvation. But it is not simply
that we disagree on an approach. If you have not done due diligence, if what
I am saying is true, then you have FAILED our father YHWH, who insists that
we must give disbelievers ever opportunity to be saved. I believe you do this
by placing Jesus, who was called the Christ, in the honest, faithful and true
context, using HIS OWN WORDS AND LIFETIME TEACHINGS, and in so doing the student
is able to grasp the brightness of the light of heaven and prepare for an eternal
life with God.

Esaias awaits your response (and I have quite a bit of an endowment for you folks too ;-)