Jehovah's Witness of the Ascended Christ

Sir:
Quite certainly I was honored to have such an
elder at my disposal. Why, had we not more
pressing matters, I might have sequestered him
for stories of the ancient. He was said to be
nearing one hundred years old, but didn't look
a day over thirty! ;-)

But pressing matters are pressing matters. For
one thing, these revelations are causing the
earth to vibrate. Shall the Watchtower Organization
pay for earthquake relief and Tsunami aid? In any
case, the importance of intelligence need not be
underestimated. My argument has been to capture,
in precision, the marvel of Hebrew Philosophy
that one man, whoever he was, signified through
the superlative human word--an angel--to his Servant
John. My uncle, Bibi, a world leader is convinced
upon reading my testament of this man, showing
how he understood the things he did--Ezekiel, Leviticus,
Adamic lore, even the mysterious days of the nephilim--
and wove it into a representation of his spirit form...
my uncle is convinced that he was, in fact, Messiah--the
anointed one of Israel. But God is a God of the living
and not the dead, so I ask Bibi, pointing at the Christ
in signified form, "IS he Messiah, the annointed one
of Israel" and not just my uncle Bibi, but the entire
congregation or Knesset nodded and said, "he must have
been and so must be." What shall we now say to these
men? That it it too late to accept the living Christ
as the Messiah? And how about the fact that, whether
we like it or not, the state of Israel was reconstituted
in this century. Whenever this is the case, it is a
matter of prophesy. Surely you can't tell me that
the reconstitution of Israel was not prophesied about?
Ah, but if you read Ezekiel you find that God set a seal
upon the people of Israel, and after a certain amount of
time promises to bring them back together, after which
"I will be their God and they will be my people," or
something as ... warming. If, in fact, BECAUSE of
the precise way in which I structured my argument
Bibi and the Knesset agree that Christ must have been
and thus then must be Messiah, then how shall you, dearest
elder, deny Israel her God?

I think you will find that though Israel has a prime minister
and a president, the invisible hand of logic that guides
policy in these the last days is granted its credibility
by one YHWH, who is the King of Israel and the living
God of the Christians. It is new, for this thing we are
speaking about did not begin to happen but recently. If
you continue to deny that this is the truth, it might be
that you are denying that the form of argument which can
convince a world leader to accept and learn the new system
does not exist. In that instance, one wonders what there is
in Christ to hope for, if all that is left is a pessimistic
awaiting of total destruction when the bible offers, time and
time again, that there are other ways through which the system
can change. As in the days of Noah, it is true, men are not
paying attention. Or, shall we say, were not. Recall that
God has promised not to wipe out ALL mankind again with a flood,
but wiping out a good deal in two seconds, though not all, has
to be seen as a reaction of God to man's ways. I urge you, sir,
please pay attention: lest the Christ walk amongst you and
you, to your eternal shame.. ignore him.