The Importance of Israel in Witness Theory

The witness is of symbolism. This is to say,
by nature's will shall twelve symbolic
tribes emerge, each with a specific semantic
lineage offering information pertinent to
the kingdom of God. Let us ask ourselves
some important questions. If the organization
is as I have seen it where I have seen it,
what is the psychology of the Jehovah's Witness
who lives in Haifa? I have a friend there
I intend to visit, but I wouldn't want
any Witnesses persecuted for the sake of
righteousness. And yet, where else shall
one get the food that is good for meat?
Being born of a virgin, in my tribe,
implies that one did not pass through the
birth canal. It is one more of the primitive
symbolisms and implications of Adamic lore
in my culture, than those children born
by Caesarean-Section are especially gifted
with a sensitivity to ... our times. I am
one such child. Recently, as though influenced
by the writings of Luke, I ordered a review of
the entire world with respect to the bilateral
consequence of association with each country.
Born of a virgin and now influenced by Luke.
What else does my symbolic tribe declaim by
virtue of the innocence of virginity?

"The innocence of virginity"

But exactly, this is what we are describing. IF
we agree, gentlemen, that the book of Genesis
was using figurative days, and knowing this does
not give us license to be imperfect as our father
in heaven is not, THEN we must also agree that
it is quite likely that my interpretation of the
Virgin Mary is the correct one. Otherwise,
you might have to demonstrate to me why YOUR
virgin, your symbolic virgin, is in any
way truly a virgin.

Lord Mary Victor
Olodumare, a God and King

In a class I teach, we agree immediately that
given what we have witnessed, the chances of
man not destroying himself through war and
pestilence is zero. Then we go on to attempt
to guess when the year is when man finally
wipes himself off the planet. Since World War I,
the great war, man has demonstrated the ability
to do just this. As the book of Daniel, reiterated
by Jesus in his prediction-prophesy of Revelation,
foretells. So it has been, since that era,
no news to the quiet thinkers that in fact
mankind, having the ability to tax the whole
world, also has the ability to destroy the whole
world. It is the basis, eghodo, for the linearity
in the book of the Revelation. Where are we
according to the predictions of a man who
had a disagreement with his evidently wrong
fathers as concerns where we should be headed
in a world where all men can be taxed? That's
the question required of those who want to
understand what the bible teaches.

As regards Israel, your younger ambassador
was unable to RECOGNIZE immediately the important
concept of intellectual disagreement between
fathers and sons, and yet the ENTIRE bible, as
demonstrated by the book of Malachi, the Books of
Matthew, Mark, Luke, John and the Revelation,
is about THE intellectual disagreement between
Jesus and his fathers.

Your older witness, however, as usual, was
as we say in our neighborhood, "on point."

Currently I have a disagreement with my fathers
who had not, like some of my fathers in America,
the learnings associated with clarity in Christianity.
And so they reverted to the animisms that have
bedeviled Africa for ages. With my continued
ransacking of the throne room of God, searching
for the most precise treasures, there no longer
remains an excuse for the lack of Christianity
in my parts. Neither will imperfection in these
parts continue to be... unnoticed.

Concerning Israel, and what the Bible obviously is,
the relevant questions are:

1. Does the Rabbinate accept the representations
given by scholars as concerns Jesus' interpretation
of Mosaic Law?

2. If so, then Jesus' argument is alive. Permitting me to,
THEN, represent Jesus as his argument to the living
congress of Jewish Rabbi's, I must ask once and for all,
the Rabbi's of the State of Israel: Gentlemen, given
the highest witness I provide of the teachings of
Jesus Christ with respect to the Law of Moses, was
or was not Jesus Messiah, the anointed one, the Christ?