On the Agenda for Minister Faramade

1. His listening skills leave MUCH to be desired,
and even his subsequent input does not repair
his behavior upon interruption. As Bob Marley
says, he's running and he's running and he's
running away. Perhaps he's done something wrong?

[19] Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath:

2. Any spirit that denies that Christ came in the flesh
is not of God, and that "any spirit" can exist in time.
So when Minister Faramade runs from the context defined
by 607BC - 1914AD, in diminishing the reflection of the
physical christ, seeing, he says, as Christ is the firstborn
of all creation, he confuses himself only. For, given the precision
of the Hebrew Prophesies, it is important that Christ came in the
flesh 2000 years ago. We have insight into what they believed
during the time of Christ, the conversation about "the LORD said
to my Lord," and it should fortify our belief in the physical
man himself. It seems that not perhaps being anointed or having
the talent of the saints, Minister Faramade concludes that talent is
not critical in this discourse--when in fact we are ONLY talking about
the talent of the physical man who, through an angel, narrated the
Hebrew Prophesies in perfect order to his disciple John, in the process
putting together civilization's most precious memoir of our time
as a high society of beings.

3. The New Testament is written in three periods: The synoptic, the apostolic
and the Resurrection. Clearly, it did not take one day or one week or even
one month for Jesus, through his angel, to narrate the priceless work through
and angel to John. So we HAVE to assume that this narration took place
after the supposed events of the crucifixion, for there is no evidence or
allusion to this BEFORE. The catholics say, and I tend to agree, that the
book of the Revelation was sourced from the Resurrected Christ, giving us
perfect vision of what Jesus means when he says in Matthew 22 that the Resurrected
are as unto the angels in heaven.

4. Your ways are not my ways. In your ... organization you have the anointed or
the talented or the saints. In my organization we have the same thing, but
minister Faramade who believes he is fallen insists on continuing to use phrases
like "we the fallen, me and you," or "people like me and you who are not
anointed." Sadly, apostle Gail, for this reason alone is Minister Faramade not
welcome. For in my religion I'm one of the anointed, and this is evident
relatively to those watching the conversation: for Minister Faramade has given
a very bad account of himself and thus the Jehovah's Witness organization.
Unwilling to hear the truth if it is in fact the truth, how could this be so
of international bible students. Whenever I wish to bring up a point of serious
logic or its inconsistency to Minister Faramade, he begins to interrupt and quote
spurious "inspired" verses until it is time to abscond. Then he comes back
with those whose presence he believes is coercive enough.. to convince me to
consider baptism? A man who has demonstrated that he has not the aptitude in my
organization to appreciate the ritual of baptism, goes from house to house
exporting the concept? Why, I seriously wondered if like Paul did with two
blasphemers, you have delivered Minister Faramade up to me for judgment.

5. Minister Faramade is evidently unclear on what the Christ DID in ordering
the prophesies in the book of the Revelation. Despite a myriad of cross
references in his bible, it is evident that he has not himself read the whole book.
He does not seem to realize, immediately--and then later sometimes admits--that
Christ is DEFINED by his mastery of the Hebrew prophesies and that the entire book
of revelation is only, and only proof of this. The synoptic gospels paint a
picture of an argument had between Christ and his elders, as we have one now
between the Prince of Zaria and the Elders of the Jehovah's Witnesses. The
Revelation PROVES that Christ was the Master he was said to be in the gospels.
It also demonstrates a conquest over death, since there is no evidence that
DURING Jesus' three year ministry he took time to narrate the prophesies to John.
If you read the book of Revelation, one is astounded at its precision and one
is quite clear that it could not have been written DURING the three year ministry
of Christ. And so, it is evidence of the Resurrected Christ.

6. These trivial matters need to be addressed before we go into more serious
discussions about what who evangelizes the Christ ought to have logically
have available as a talking point at their finger tips. I would not suggest
anyone going out to preach the gospel who is not clear on the basic tenets
of Christian Logic. You shall know the truth, elders, and it will set you free.