Difference Between A Stimulus Bill and a Spending Bill

"They say it's not a stimulus bill, that's it's a spending bill. Well, what do you think a stimulus is? That's the point! No, really!"

President Obama displaying "seismic" ignorance about the economy. First, allow me tackle "this notion" that the last administration ran us into the ground. My value, ascertained by certain agencies, is beyond "quite significant." The technologies I have helped develop are said to be seminal. It is why I have a voice in this debate, for only in America do we find value given its worth or anywhere close to it. So I know. Folks on the man's team can easily verify my record, then whistle loudly for all to hear, if and when they discover America's first trillionaire, granted his money by an alien spaceship, the Space Station Jerusalem. Ahem.

The economy, folks, is componentized by scarcity. A Stimulus bill develops wealth-generating resources at varying levels of depth, a spending bill is meant to improve capital infrastructure as an adjunct to developing wealth generating resources. I'll say this only once, that Mr. Obama and Dr. Summers are certain, if not now, tomorrow to lead America into bankruptcy. These... gentlemen continue to ignore my value, notarized by global securities, to win an intellectual argument long since lost. Mr. Obama has lost faith in his own ability to administer the second part of the TARP--something I can do quite easily if he hired me, with, gousha, charts, maps, detailed semantics and e'erthing--and so wants a super TARP, to put people back to work "for a season" then coerce them to spend American during which time they will ostensibly put their money in banks and then the banks will lend. This is a fallacy. Lending, mortgage, is where the problem is and if the TARP was a failure the first time, then it is Obama's duty to fix it. For crying out loud, three fifty bill is more money than I've ever lent anyone, except treasury, once, but that was for the "War Against Violent Extremism" in Iraq. It ought to fix the problem. I can detail how, ANYTIME Dr. Summers wants to challenge me, but for a man who believes that women are lesser, I can't imagine that he would have the temperament to debate with America's first trillionaire. It takes a while sir, but it does roll off the tongue easy. Trillionaire. Instead of Messers Obama and Summers to get with the program and admit what crashed the economy--my value--as was admitted by previoius kings, they shall run America into the ground and she is certain, under Obama, to lose her dominance.
Besides this, I think that Mr. Obama's comportment is... an embarrasment. For a leader to use fearmongering for political reasons is something we'd expect from Hugo Chavez or Ahmadinejad. Instead, Obama bandies words like "irreversible" and "catastrophic" to speak to an issue I would easilly win in any sort of fair forum, since I am censored because, obviously, I am smarter than our president! I predict that the Stimulus will be like President Obasanjo's power expendisture. It will yield little and will not solve the liquidity crisis which is bound to linger so long as the Obama administration fails to calibrate, like President Bush did, the American securities market to correct for the empirical tension required to finance the best ideas. America is about ideas, not "jobs" created by the government. I'm a strict capitalist, but having been laid off once in my career, I realize that the politics are sensitive. Let's be honest, Mr. Obama indeed screwed up, but not in nominating Daschle. He screwed up in not being hands on while Nancy Pelosi behaved like a foolish brat, jeopardizing his presidency in totality. If the bill was that important, then Obama ought to have pressured Pelosi for the sort of compromise because of which the bill would have already passed. Instead, Pelosi stuffs the bill with foolishness and says that these foolishnesses are better than tax cuts. Go figure. I content that liberal theology is dying in the minds of most serious men. And women.