In my understanding, at least in this paradigm--which I find quite convincing--
the date at which convolution occurred, when it was proven logically that Jesus
existed and that a threshold percentage of reported miracles were logically feasible was zero. The idea that Jesus lived during the year zero, in my understanding, is false. I understand that the Jesus idea lived from Greece through the decline of the era of the great poets and the rise of Roman Dominion. Now this is not the usual afrocentric speak of Jesus being a reincarnation of Osiris. I am being quite more precise here. I believe that, led by John, men of repute sought to find out if in fact this Jesus was merely a hyperbole and legend or if he was real. I believe they found out that one with an IQ that skewed the intelligence curve did in fact come out of or around the region of Galilee. Some people will inform you that Jesus was buried in Egypt. Others say he was in fact a Pharaoh. I am not yet sure, although I am leaning towards him being some sort of ad hoc circumstantial Pharaoh. Recall that the relationship between Kemet and Judea was not so dichotomous as it is today. Things were certainly more fluid in that context. I am not alone in this belief. I have met two other high-ranking civic men of the Order who believe, also,
that according to the science of the times, Jesus was proven in zero then ratified
after the recalcitrance in logic of the priests of Constantine who, as you should know, were the real emperor. But you know this, yes? That every emperor IS his priests? Ah, think about it, sinner. Think about why.
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment